Event Categories: BSPS Choice Group Conjectures and Refutations Popper Seminar Sigma Club

Past Events › Sigma Club
Events List Navigation
Peter Achinstein (Johns Hopkins): Who needs proof: James Clerk Maxwell on Scientific method
Abstract: Isaac Newton famously claimed that hypotheses, i.e., unproved propositions, have no place in "experimental philosophy." James Clerk Maxwell disagreed and proposed three methods that can legitimately be employed when a scientist lacks proof for a theory, or even a theory to be proved. What are these methods, and are they legitimate?
Find out more »Daniel Bedingham (Oxford) “Time reversal symmetry and collapse models”
Abstract: Collapse models are modifications of quantum theory where the wave function is treated as physically real and the collapse of the wave function is a physical process. This appears to introduce a time reversal asymmetry into the dynamics of the wave function since the collapses affect only the future state. We challenge this conclusion, showing that if the physically…
Find out more »Kasia Rejzner (York) “Causality in the modern approach to foundations of quantum field theory”
Abstract. According to the present state of knowledge, the Universe in small scales is described by the laws of quantum theory. On the other hand, the fundamental theory of gravity is believed to be Einstein's relativity. Its effects become relevant when we consider large masses or (equivalently) large energies. One of the main features of Einstein's theory is the fact…
Find out more »Thomas Pashby (USC), “Schrödinger’s Cat: It’s about time (not measurement)”
To avoid paradox, I maintain that two simple tensed conditionals are true: (i) if the atom has decayed then the cat is dead; (ii) if the atom has not decayed then the cat is alive. So long as it is true at some time that the atom decays then it follows from tense logic (under mild constraints) that at all…
Find out more »Roman Frigg (LSE): “Rethinking Equilibrium”
Abstract: In Boltzmannian statistical mechanics macro-states supervene on micro-states. This leads to a partitioning of the state space of a system into regions of macroscopically indistinguishable micro-states. The largest of these regions is singled out as the equilibrium region of the system. What justifies this association? We review currently available answers to this question and find them wanting both for…
Find out more »Michael Miller (Pittsburgh) “What kind of thing is a quantum field?”
Standard approaches to the interpretation of physical theories require a structurally unambiguous characterization of the models of a theory. In this talk I argue that the nature of the empirical support for quantum field theory does not warrant commitment to one particular type of structure as constitutive of the theory. Rather, the empirical adequacy of some models of the theory…
Find out more »Karim Thebault (Bristol) “Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’ and the ‘Problem of Time'”
Abstract: The canonical formalism of general relativity affords a particularly interesting characterisation of the infamous hole argument. It also provides a natural formalism in which to relate the hole argument to the problem of time in classical and quantum gravity. In this paper I will examine the connection between these two much discussed problems in the foundations of spacetime theory…
Find out more »Natalja Deng (Cambridge) “Passage and temporal experience”
Abstract: The conflict between an objective passage of time and relativistic physics is sometimes summed up as follows: first, relativistic physics implies a ‘B-theoretic’ or ‘block universe’ view of time, and second, the B-theory implies that there is no objective passage. Here, I’ll take issue with the second entailment claim. I begin by presenting the case for veridicalism, the claim…
Find out more »Pablo Ruiz de Olano (Notre Dame) “Context-ladenness in Theoretical Physics: Symmetries, Conservation laws, and the Strong Nuclear Interaction”
Abstract: TBA
Find out more »Friedel Weinert (Bradford) “Temporal Asymmetry or Symmetry? On the cosmological arrow of time”
Abstract: This talk proposes to re-examine the parity-of-reasoning or double-standard fallacy argument, which favours a time-symmetric Gold universe model over a cosmological arrow of time. There are two reasons for this re-examination. One is empirical: 1) the recent discovery of an expanding and accelerating universe questions the symmetry assumption of the Gold universe on empirical grounds; 2) the other is…
Find out more »Eran Tal (Cambridge): “Making Time: A Study in the Epistemology of Measurement”
Abstract: This article develops a model-based account of the standardization of physical measurement, taking the contemporary standardization of time as its central case study. To standardize the measurement of a quantity, I argue, is to legislate the mode of application of a quantity concept to a collection of exemplary artefacts. Legislation involves an iterative exchange between top-down adjustments to theoretical and…
Find out more »Lakatos Award Workshop on Geometry and Physics
Gordon Belot and David Malament together with Fay Dowker and Klaas Landsman will participate in a 1-day workshop on geometry and physics, in honour of their winning of the 2014 Lakatos Award. #LSELakatos
Find out more »Lakatos Award Lectures and Ceremony
Lectures by the 2014 Lakatos Award winners, Gordon Belot and David Malament, followed by a public award ceremony. #LSELakatos
Find out more »Mark Addis (Birmingham City) “Categorical Abstract Model Theory and the Syntax of Physical Theories”
The syntactic approach to physical theories was and is unpopular for reasons which have much more to do with the limitations of first order logic than any fundamental philosophical deficiencies of the position itself … #SigmaClub
Find out more »Michael Redhead and Prof Sir Richard Sorabji, “A Simplified Version Of Goedel’s Theorem”
The proof of the godel theorems is notoriously difficult to understand. We present a simplified version using sorites arithmetic which is much easier to follow. #SigmaClub
Find out more »Sebastian de Haro (Amsterdam, Cambridge), “On Dualities and Emergence of Diffeomorphism Invariance”
Sebastian de Haro is a Senior lecturer in theoretical physics at the Amsterdam University College (AUC) and the Faculty of Science of the University of Amsterdam. His 2001 PhD in physics was under Gerard 't Hooft, and he is currently pursuing a PhD in Philosophy at Cambridge under Jeremy Butterfield. #SigmaClub
Find out more »Carlo Rovelli: “Why Physics needs Philosophy” (Public Lecture)
Some questions of modern physics cannot be addressed without philosophical awareness. An increasing number of physicists are again reading philosophy. I illustrate the conversation between Physics and Philosophy, which has produced some of the most successful ideas of the history of science, focusing on the nature of space and time. #LSEFoundations
Find out more »James Owen Weatherall (Irvine): “On Stuff: The Field Concept in Classical Physics”
Discussions of physical ontology often come down to two basic options. Either the basic physical entities are particles, or else they are fields. James Owen Weatherall will argue that, in fact, it is not at all clear what it would mean to say that the world consists of fields.
Find out more »Elay Shech (Auburn University): “Idealizations, Essential Self-Adjointness, and Minimal Model Explanation in the Aharonov-Bohm Effect”
Two approaches to understanding the idealizations that arise in the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect are presented. It is argued that the standard topological approach, which takes the non-simply connected electron configuration space to be an essential element in the explanation and understanding of the effect, is flawed.
Find out more »Feraz Azhar (Cambridge): “Three aspects of typicality in multiverse cosmology”
Extracting predictions from cosmological theories that describe a multiverse, for what we are likely to observe in our domain, is crucial to establishing the validity of these theories. One way to extract such predictions is from theory-generated probability distributions that allow for selection effects – generally expressed in terms of assumptions about anthropic conditionalization and how typical we are. In this talk, I urge three lessons about typicality in multiverse settings.
Find out more »