Dr Timothy Liau

Dr Timothy Liau

Assistant Professor of Law

LSE Law School

Room No
Cheng Kin Ku Building 6.14
Languages
English, French, Mandarin
Key Expertise
Private Law

About me

Tim is interested in all aspects of private law, especially contracts, unjust enrichment and restitution, commercial remedies, and private law theory. 

Before joining LSE, he was Assistant Professor (tenure-track) at the National University of Singapore. Prior to that he was Stipendiary Lecturer in Law at Merton College, Oxford, where he also taught Commercial Remedies on the BCL. 

Tim read for his BCL, MPhil, and DPhil at Oxford, as a Clarendon Scholar. He earned his LLB from the NUS as top student and Lee Kuan Yew Gold Medalist. 

He is the author of Standing in Private Law (OUP 2023), which won the Society of Legal Scholars’ Peter Birks prize. His publications have been cited by the Singapore High Court and Court of Appeal, the High Court of Australia, and in Goff & Jones on Unjust EnrichmentLewin on Trusts, and Chitty on Contracts

He remains an Associate Academic Fellow of the National University of Singapore (Centre for Legal Theory).

Research interests

Private law: especially contracts, restitution, remedies, and private law theory.

I have written about topics like contractual interpretation, misrepresentation, no-oral-modification clauses, privity of contract, and proprietary restitution. 

Currently I am working on projects including contractual remedies; enforcement of trusts; restitution from public authorities; declaratory judgments; and punishment.

Teaching

Books

Standing in Private Law (OUP 2023)

Standing in Private Law: Powers of Enforcement in the Law of Obligations and Trusts develops the idea that we should attend more to 'standing', conceived as a power to hold another accountable before a court as a distinct private law concept. Prominent lawyers have claimed that private law does not have or need standing rules, yet this seems implausible. If private law is obligation-imposing, we need rules about who can sue on these obligations to hold their bearers accountable. This book argues that a reason why standing has been relatively overlooked and under-conceptualized, receiving meagre attention from private lawyers, is because it has been obscured from plain sight: it has been swallowed up by the more dominant and capacious concept of a 'right'. However, standing is a distinct and separable private law concept that can and should be distinguished more clearly from 'right'. Doing so is necessary for the continued rational development of private law doctrine. It is also necessary for a deeper theoretical understanding of standing's significance, and its place within the remedial apparatus of private law. This book argues that an implicit standing rule exists across the law of obligations. It examines its justifiability, and the justifiability of exceptions to the rule. It also shows how and why recognising standing's distinctiveness can help us to interpret, develop, and resolve debates within different areas of private law, including the laws of contract, torts, unjust enrichments, and relatedly, the law of trusts.

click here for publisher's site

Foreword to the book by the Honourable Justice James Edelman, High Court of Australia

Reviews:
Alexander Georgiou, (2024) 83(1) Cambridge Law Journal 184
- Ross Cranston KC FBA, (2023) 38(9) Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law 638

Publications